Renters' Rights Act 2025, Phase 1 commencement
Transition readiness pack

Property Law

Deeds of Covenant for Landlords UK

Deeds of covenant in leasehold assignment: direct covenant with freeholder; pre-1996 vs L&T(C)A 1995 post-1996 leases; Authorized Guarantee Agreements (AGAs). Freehold positive covenants: Rhone v Stephens [1994]; Halsall v Brizell mutual benefit and burden; indemnity covenant chains; estate rentcharges; registered restrictions.

10 min readUpdated 7 June 2026Last reviewed: 17 May 2026leaseholddeed-of-covenantpositive-covenantrhone-v-stephens

Leasehold Assignment — Why Deeds of Covenant Are Required

When a leaseholder assigns (sells) their lease, the incoming owner must directly covenant with the freeholder to observe lease obligations. For pre-1996 leases, the original lessee remained personally liable for the whole term — the deed of covenant gave the freeholder a direct remedy against the current occupier. Most long residential and commercial leases contain a requirement for a deed of covenant on every assignment as a condition of the freeholder's consent.

L&T(C)A 1995 — Post-1995 Leases

Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995: for leases granted on or after 1 January 1996, the outgoing lessee is automatically released from covenants on assignment. The incoming lessee is directly bound by privity of estate. Many modern leases still require a deed of covenant as a condition of assignment consent. Authorized Guarantee Agreements (AGAs) — guarantee of immediate assignee's performance — are available on first assignment only.

Freehold Positive Covenants

Rhone v Stephens [1994] AC 310 HL: burden of positive freehold covenant does not run with land. A deed of covenant alone cannot make a positive obligation enforceable against a freehold successor. Workarounds: Halsall v Brizell mutual benefit-and-burden (narrow exception); estate rentcharges; restrictions on title requiring certification of deed of covenant before registration of transfer.

Indemnity Covenant Chains

Each seller requires buyer to indemnify them against breach of the original obligation. If breach occurs, liability passes back through the chain to the original covenantor. Chain weakness: breaks if any link is insolvent or untraceable. A direct deed of covenant with the freeholder is far more robust where the lease requires one.

Practical Implications for Landlords

Leasehold acquisition: confirm whether the lease requires a deed of covenant; obtain it at completion. Freehold maintenance obligations: design enforceable mechanism at outset — estate rentcharge or restriction. Mortgage lenders require evidence of deed of covenant where lease mandates one. Conveyancing solicitor responsible for ensuring deed is obtained and executed at the time of assignment.

Frequently asked questions

What is a deed of covenant in leasehold?+

A deed by which an incoming leaseholder covenants directly with the freeholder to observe all lease obligations for the remainder of the term. It gives the freeholder a direct contractual remedy against the actual occupier without relying on the original lessee's continuing liability.

Can positive covenants be enforced against freehold successors?+

Not directly — Rhone v Stephens [1994] established that the burden of a positive freehold covenant does not run with the land. Mechanisms for enforcement against successors include estate rentcharges, restrictions on title, and the Halsall v Brizell mutual benefit-and-burden principle.

What is an Authorized Guarantee Agreement (AGA)?+

Under the L&T(C)A 1995, a freeholder can require an outgoing leaseholder to guarantee the immediate incoming leaseholder's performance as a condition of consent to assign. The AGA only covers the immediate assignee and only applies on first assignment from the original lessee.

Found a gap or disagree with something?

Reply to any LetSafe email or write to Richard@letsafeuk.co.uk. We rewrite guides when we get something wrong, the sooner we hear, the sooner we fix it.

Hand-picked by topic overlap with this guide.

Leasehold Law
Collective Enfranchisement for Landlords UK
LRHUDA 1993 Part I: qualifying buildings (25% commercial floor area limit), qualifying leaseholders (2/3 long leases; 50% participation), RTE company procedure, price formula (capitalised ground rent; deferment value; marriage value), LFRA 2024 abolition of marriage value, and implications for freehold landlords who cannot refuse a valid claim.
Property Conveyancing Law
Flying Freehold UK — What Landlords Need to Know
Flying freehold: part of one freehold property overhangs/underlies another separately-owned freehold; positive covenants don't bind successors (Rhone v Stephens [1994]); Halsall v Brizell [1957] benefit-burden principle; UK Finance Mortgage Lenders Handbook lender concerns; title indemnity insurance (single premium); deed of mutual covenant; commonhold conversion (CLRA 2002); Law Commission No 327 (2011) reform recommendations; TA6 disclosure; Scotland TC(S)A 2003 positive real burdens (no equivalent problem).
Leasehold Reform
Leasehold Enfranchisement House UK — Buying the Freehold Under LRA 1967 and LFRRA 2024 Changes
Covers the qualifying conditions for freehold acquisition under LRA 1967 (long tenancy; house; 2-year occupation and ownership; abolition of low rent test), the modern method price calculation (diminution + 50% marriage value + compensation), Dano v Earl Cadogan [2023] hope value, and the LFRRA 2024 abolition of marriage value and prescribed valuation rates.
Leasehold Law
Headlease UK — Intermediate Landlords, Headlessee Obligations, and Subleasing Structure
Covers the three-tier headlease structure (freeholder → headlessee → subtenant); headlessee obligations upward (headlease covenants, rent, repair, insurance, alienation) and downward (HA 1985 s.11, deposit protection, HMO licensing); forfeiture risk and subtenant relief (LPA 1925 s.146(4)); alienation covenants and direct covenants with freeholders; and term extension under LTA 1993.
RMC: Company Managing Leasehold Block — May Hold Freehold or Manage Under Contract — Directors Have Full CA 2006 Duties — Companies Act Filings: CS01; Accounts; PSC; Directors Within 14 Days — LTA 1985 Service Charge: Reasonable; Section 20 Consultation Above £250/Leaseholder; Separate Trust Accounts — LTA 1987 Right of First Refusal on Freehold Sale — RTM vs RMC: RTM Is Statutory (CLRA 2002); RMC Is Contractual
Residential Management Company UK 2026 — RMC Director Duties, Service Charge Governance and RTM vs RMC
Residential Management Company guide 2026: RMC manages leasehold block (common parts; service charge; contractors); may hold freehold. Directors' CA 2006 duties: act within powers; promote success (s.172); independent judgment; reasonable care; avoid conflicts (s.175); no third-party benefits; declare interests (s.177/182). Companies Act compliance: annual confirmation statement (CS01; £34); annual accounts; PSC register; director changes within 14 days. Service charge LTA 1985: reasonable; Section 20 consultation (qualifying works over £250/leaseholder); separate trust accounts (s.42); prescribed demand form (s.21 summary). RTM vs RMC: RTM statutory right under CLRA 2002 (no freehold purchase required; freeholder retains freehold); RMC is private/contractual. LTA 1987 right of first refusal: criminal offence to sell freehold without first offering to qualifying tenants. D&O insurance. ARMA/RICS managing agents. Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024.
Commonhold vs Leasehold, CLRA 2002, LFRA 2024 and Implications for Property Investors
Landlord Commonhold Guide 2026
Commonhold explained for landlords 2026: permanent freehold ownership of individual flat units (no lease expiry; no ground rent; no landlord-tenant relationship); governed by Commonhold Community Statement (CCS); common parts owned by commonhold association (company limited by guarantee; all unit-holders are members); only ~20-30 schemes ever created; LFRA 2024 and forthcoming Commonhold Bill aim to make commonhold default for new-build flats; letting a commonhold flat — check CCS for subletting rules; Scotland: title conditions and Tenements (Scotland) Act 2004.