Renters' Rights Act 2025, Phase 1 commencement
Transition readiness pack

Property Rights Law

Implied Easements — UK Landlord and Property Guide

Implied easements arising on disposition of part of an estate: (1) s.62 LPA 1925 — general words clause; informal permissions upgraded to legal easements on conveyance/lease (Wright v Macadam [1949] KB 744; Sovmots Investments v Secretary of State [1979] — prior separate occupation required); (2) Wheeldon v Burrows (1879) 12 Ch D 31 — quasi-easements continuous and apparent AND reasonably necessary implied on sale/lease of part; no prior separate occupation required; (3) easement of necessity — genuinely landlocked land (Barry v Hasseldine [1952]); (4) common intention — Pwllbach Colliery v Woodman [1915]; Wong v Beaumont Property Trust [1965]; LRA 2002: registration/overriding interest requirements (Sch 3, para 3); exclude s.62 expressly in commercial leases.

10 min readUpdated 7 June 2026Last reviewed: 17 May 2026easementimplied-easementsection-62wheeldon-burrows

Section 62 LPA 1925

s.62 LPA 1925: every conveyance of land passes all rights, privileges, and easements enjoyed with the land — informal permissions can be upgraded to legal easements. Wright v Macadam [1949]: permission to use coal shed became legal easement on grant of new tenancy. Prior separate occupation required (Sovmots Investments v Secretary of State [1979]): s.62 only operates where the dominant land (part conveyed) was separately occupied from the servient land (retained part). Exclude s.62 expressly in commercial leases and transfers.

Wheeldon v Burrows (1879)

On sale/lease of part: grantor impliedly grants quasi-easements (rights exercised over retained land for benefit of granted land) that are: (1) continuous and apparent; AND (2) reasonably necessary for comfortable enjoyment. Continuous and apparent: visible or discoverable on inspection — worn path; surface drain; roof guttering. No prior separate occupation required (unlike s.62) — operates on first sale/lease of part. Reasonably necessary: more than convenient but less than strictly essential.

Easement of Necessity and Common Intention

Easement of necessity: implied where land genuinely landlocked — strictly interpreted (Barry v Hasseldine [1952]); inconvenient access insufficient; necessity must exist at time of grant. Common intention (Pwllbach Colliery [1915]): implied where specific purpose of grant makes right obviously necessary and both parties shared that intention. Wong v Beaumont [1965]: basement restaurant required extractor duct — implied by common intention (restaurant use required ventilation).

Registered Land and LRA 2002

LRA 2002 s.27: legal easement over registered land must be registered or qualify as overriding interest. Overriding interest (LRA 2002 Sch 3, para 3): easement qualifies if obvious on reasonable inspection OR known to buyer OR exercised within the year before disposition. Unregistered implied easements may be equitable only — binding only on parties with notice. Ensure all intended easements are expressly granted and registered.

Excluding s.62 and Practical Steps

Commercial leases and transfers should expressly exclude s.62 LPA 1925 and Wheeldon v Burrows: 'Nothing in this [deed/lease] operates to grant any easement other than those expressly set out herein.' Ensure all intended rights are expressly granted and registered for registered land. Before granting a new lease of part, identify all quasi-easements and permissions that may be converted by s.62 or Wheeldon v Burrows — and either formalise them or exclude them.

Frequently asked questions

What is an implied easement?+

An implied easement is a right over land arising by operation of law on sale or lease of part of a property, without express grant in the deed. The main routes are s.62 LPA 1925 (converting informal permissions) and Wheeldon v Burrows (1879) (implied grant of quasi-easements). Easement of necessity and common intention easements are additional routes.

How does Section 62 LPA 1925 affect landlords?+

Section 62 means that on granting a new tenancy, any informal permissions the tenant was exercising over the landlord's retained land (e.g., using a shared storage area, crossing a yard) may be converted to permanent legal easements. Wright v Macadam [1949]: a coal shed permission became a legal easement on grant of a new tenancy. Landlords should expressly exclude s.62 in all commercial leases.

Can a landlord prevent implied easements arising?+

Yes — by including an express exclusion clause: 'Nothing in this [deed/lease] shall operate to grant any easement, right, or privilege other than those expressly set out herein.' This excludes s.62 LPA 1925 and Wheeldon v Burrows. All intended rights should be expressly granted and noted on the register for registered land.

Found a gap or disagree with something?

Reply to any LetSafe email or write to Richard@letsafeuk.co.uk. We rewrite guides when we get something wrong, the sooner we hear, the sooner we fix it.

Hand-picked by topic overlap with this guide.

Property Law
Rights of Way and Easements UK — Landlord Guide to Access Rights, Restrictive Covenants, and Disputes
Covers the four requirements for a valid easement (Re Ellenborough Park [1956]); how easements are created by express grant/reservation, implied grant (Wheeldon v Burrows; LPA 1925 s.62), and prescription (Prescription Act 1832); scope and obstruction of rights of way; restrictive covenants (Tulk v Moxhay; s.84 LPA 1925 discharge); and extinguishment by unity of ownership, express release, or abandonment.
England and Wales · Lease Option Agreement: Investor Pays Option Premium (1-3% of Option Price; Non-Refundable) + Takes Lease + Sub-Lets to Tenants for a Margin · Option to Purchase at Pre-Agreed Price — Exercisable During Option Period (Typically 3-10 Years) · SDLT on Option Premium (FA 2003 s.46 — Option Is a Chargeable Interest; Additional Dwelling Surcharge Applies) · SDLT on Exercise at Pre-Agreed Option Price (NOT Market Value) — Option Premium SDLT Credited · LPA 1925 s.2: Option Contract in Writing Signed by Both Parties · Register Option at HMLR by Notice (LRA 2002 s.32) — Protects Priority Against Third Parties · Grantor's Mortgagee Consent Required · Investor Is Landlord to Sub-Tenants — All Compliance Obligations Apply (RRA 2025; Deposits; EPC; Gas Safety)
Lease Option Agreement UK — How Lease Options Work, Option Premium, SDLT (FA 2003 s.46), LPA 1925 Legal Requirements, HMLR Registration and Investor Risks
Lease option guide 2026: how a lease option agreement works — investor pays non-refundable option premium (1-3% of option price) and takes lease of property; sub-lets to tenants for a rental margin during the option period; exercises option if property value rises above option price (acquiring at pre-agreed price regardless of then-current market value). SDLT on option premium (FA 2003 s.46 — option is a chargeable interest; additional dwelling surcharge applies); SDLT on exercise at pre-agreed option price (not market value; option premium SDLT credited). LPA 1925 s.2: option contract in writing signed by both parties. Register option at HMLR by notice (LRA 2002 s.32) — protects priority against third-party purchasers. Grantor mortgage consent required. Investor acts as landlord to sub-tenants — all landlord compliance obligations apply (RRA 2025; deposit protection; EPC; gas safety; EICR; right to rent).
Property Law
Right to Light for Landlords UK
Right to light as easement: Prescription Act 1832 s.3 (20 years' actual enjoyment); Colls v Home and Colonial Stores [1904] standard (sufficient for ordinary comfortable use); infringement assessment (Waldram methodology; BRE guidelines); planning permission does not override (Heaney v Leeds City Council [2020]); remedies — injunction or damages in lieu (Shelfer criteria; SCA 1981 s.50); Rights of Light Act 1959 light obstruction notice; deeds of release; indemnity insurance.
Property Development Law
Ransom Strip UK — What Landlords and Property Developers Need to Know
Ransom strip: narrow third-party strip between property and public highway; owner demands payment for access rights; Stokes v Cambridge Corporation (1961) one-third rule (strip owner entitled to 1/3 of development value uplift); CON29 Q7 highway search to identify gap; prescriptive easement (Prescription Act 1832; 20 years open use without permission); title indemnity insurance for minor adopted verge gaps; overage/clawback alternatives; compulsory purchase as leverage reducer.
Planning Law
Change of Use Planning UK — Use Classes, HMOs, and Short-Term Lets
How the Use Classes Order and permitted development rights govern residential-to-HMO conversions, commercial-to-residential prior approval, and the new Use Class C5 for short-term lets.
Planning Law
Planning Enforcement UK — Enforcement Notices, Limitation Periods, and Defending Breaches
How local planning authorities investigate and remedy planning breaches — enforcement notices, breach of condition notices, stop notices, injunctions — and the limitation periods that provide immunity from enforcement after a fixed period.