NPPF Viability Framework and the NPPG Methodology
NPPF para 57 presumes policy-compliant applications are viable; a viability assessment is only required where the applicant seeks to provide less than the full policy-level obligations. The NPPG (updated 2019) standardises the residual land value (RLV) method: GDV minus all costs minus developer profit equals RLV. RLV is compared to benchmark land value (BLV = existing use value plus a landowner premium). Where RLV exceeds BLV the scheme is viable at the full obligation level. Parkhurst Road [2018] confirms the publication requirement.
The Residual Appraisal — GDV, Costs, and Developer Profit
GDV: total sales receipts or capitalised income. Build costs: BCIS-based rates adjusted for location and abnormals. Professional fees: 10-15% of build costs. Finance: 6-8% on land and build during the development period. Developer profit: 15-20% on GDV for market housing (NPPG guidance); 6% on cost for affordable. BLV: EUV plus 10-20% landowner premium (NPPG). RLV = GDV minus (costs plus profit). If RLV falls below BLV, obligations must be reduced.
Section 106 Viability Negotiation and Review Mechanisms
Local Plans set affordable housing policy requirements (typically 20-40% on sites above 10 units). Where the full requirement is unviable, the LPA must accept a reduced level. Viability review mechanism clauses allow the LPA to recapture profit uplift at key milestones. s.106A allows modification where market conditions have changed post-grant; s.106B gives a right of appeal to the Planning Inspectorate if the LPA refuses modification.
CIL Exemptions and the Housing Delivery Test
CIL exemptions: self-build homes and extensions up to 100 sq m; social housing (CIL Regs 2010 — claim before commencement); exceptional circumstances relief where CIL itself renders development unviable; charity relief. Housing Delivery Test: LPAs delivering below 75% of housing target trigger the presumption in favour of sustainable development; below 25% adds a 20% buffer to the 5-year land supply requirement — making planning appeals for housing more likely to succeed.