Renters' Rights Act 2025, Phase 1 commencement
Transition readiness pack

Commercial Property Law

Tenancy at Will for Landlords UK

Tenancy at will in commercial property: either party can determine without notice; no LTA 1954 Part II security of tenure (Hagee (London) v AB Erikson and Larson [1976] QB 209); arises during lease negotiations (pre-lease occupation) or on holding over; conversion risk — accepting periodic rent payments converts to periodic tenancy with LTA 1954 protection; documentation; tenancy at will vs contracted-out tenancy (s.38A RRO 2003); Scotland tacit relocation.

9 min readUpdated 7 June 2026Last reviewed: 17 May 2026tenancy-at-willlta-1954commercial-leasesecurity-of-tenure

What Is a Tenancy at Will?

Tenant occupies with landlord's consent; no fixed term; no periodic rental obligation; either party can end immediately without notice. Hagee (London) v AB Erikson and Larson [1976] QB 209: genuine tenancy at will carries no LTA 1954 Part II security of tenure. Typically arises: pre-lease occupation; holding over while negotiating renewal; buyer in early occupation pre-completion.

When Does a Tenancy at Will Arise?

Pre-lease occupation: new tenant enters premises during lease negotiation before formal lease executed. Holding over: existing lease expires; parties negotiating renewal; tenant remains with consent. Pre-completion occupation: buyer permitted early occupation before purchase completes. Implied at will: can arise by implication from circumstances — label applied by parties is not conclusive.

The Conversion Risk — Periodic Tenancy

Accepting monthly payments of a regular sum from a business tenant in at-will occupation may convert the arrangement to a monthly periodic tenancy attracting LTA 1954 security of tenure. Objective test: court looks at all circumstances. Risk factors: regular monthly payments; extended occupation without new agreement; no written documentation. Preserve at-will: document in writing; express payments as mesne profits not rent; set review date for formal lease.

Tenancy at Will vs Contracted-Out Tenancy

Tenancy at will: no formalities; immediate termination; no LTA 1954 risk — but vulnerable to periodic tenancy conversion. Contracted-out tenancy (s.38A LTA 1954; RRO 2003): warning notice + declaration + lease recital; clear end date; no security of tenure risk. For pre-lease periods of weeks: at will with clear documentation appropriate. For longer periods: excluded tenancy safer.

Scotland and Northern Ireland

LTA 1954 Part II applies only in England and Wales — Scotland and NI have different regimes. Scotland: commercial leases expire on contractual date; tacit relocation: if neither party gives 40 days' notice before expiry, lease continues on same terms for further year — landlords must serve notice to quit in good time. NI: Business Tenancies (NI) Order 1996 — broadly equivalent to LTA 1954.

Frequently asked questions

What is a tenancy at will?+

A form of commercial property occupation where the tenant occupies with the landlord's consent, with no fixed term and no periodic rental obligation. Either party can end it immediately without notice. It carries no LTA 1954 security of tenure (Hagee (London) v AB Erikson [1976]). Commonly used during lease negotiations when the tenant enters premises before the formal lease is signed.

How can a tenancy at will convert to a periodic tenancy?+

If the landlord accepts monthly rent from a business tenant in at-will occupation, a court may find the arrangement has become a monthly periodic tenancy with LTA 1954 security of tenure. Prevent this by documenting the arrangement in writing, expressing payments as mesne profits (not rent), and progressing towards a formal lease without extended delay.

Should I use a tenancy at will or a contracted-out tenancy?+

For very short pre-lease periods (a few weeks), a tenancy at will with clear written documentation is straightforward. For longer periods, a short excluded tenancy under LTA 1954 s.38A (with warning notice and declaration) provides more certainty and eliminates the conversion risk. Both are preferable to undocumented holding over.

Found a gap or disagree with something?

Reply to any LetSafe email or write to Richard@letsafeuk.co.uk. We rewrite guides when we get something wrong, the sooner we hear, the sooner we fix it.

Hand-picked by topic overlap with this guide.

Commercial Property Law
Contracting Out of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954
LTA 1954 s.38A and RRO 2003 (SI 2003/3096): excluding security of tenure from a commercial tenancy — prescribed warning notice (Sch 1/3); simple declaration (≥14 days, Sch 2) or statutory declaration before independent solicitor (<14 days, Sch 4); lease must record exclusion; each new lease requires fresh procedure; common pitfalls; Scotland has no equivalent.
LTA 1954 Part II: Business Tenants Have Statutory Right to Renew Lease — Landlord Opposes on s.30 Grounds (a)-(g) — s.25 Notice (6-12 Months) — Contracting Out (s.38A Warning Notice + Statutory Declaration) — Compensation on No-Fault Grounds (e)(f)(g)
Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 UK 2026 — Business Tenancy Security of Tenure, Contracting Out and s.25 Notices
Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part II applies to commercial tenancies (premises occupied for business purposes). Business tenants have statutory security of tenure (right to renew lease at end of contractual term). Landlord can oppose renewal on s.30(1) grounds: (a)-(c) fault grounds; (d)-(g) no-fault grounds. s.25 notice (landlord terminates): 6-12 months; must state whether opposing and on which grounds. Contracting out (s.38A): formal warning notice + tenant statutory declaration before lease granted. Compensation payable only on no-fault grounds (e)(f)(g): 1× rateable value (2× after 14 years). NI: Business Tenancies (NI) Order 1996. Scotland: no statutory equivalent.
LTA 1954 Lease Renewal 2026
Commercial Lease Renewal UK 2026 — LTA 1954 Security of Tenure, Section 25 Notice, Section 26 Request, Opposing Grounds and New Lease Terms
Commercial lease renewal guide 2026 under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (LTA 1954): business tenancies protected by Part II LTA 1954 do not end at contractual expiry — they continue under s.24 until validly terminated by the statutory procedure. Key provisions: (1) Continuation tenancy (s.24): protected tenancy continues after contractual expiry on the same terms until terminated. (2) Landlord's s.25 notice: specifies whether landlord opposes renewal and on which ground(s); proposed terms if not opposing; must be served 6-12 months before the specified termination date. (3) Tenant's s.26 request: proactive renewal request specifying proposed commencement date (6-12 months ahead); landlord has 2 months to counter-notice opposing renewal. (4) Opposing grounds (s.30(1)): (a) failure to repair; (b) persistent rent delays; (c) substantial breaches; (d) alternative accommodation; (e) sub-letting of part; (f) demolition or reconstruction — landlord must show fixed, definite intention with planning, finance, and contractor in place; (g) own occupation — landlord must have owned for at least 5 years. (5) Compensation (s.37): for no-fault grounds (e)(f)(g) — 1× rateable value (2× if 14+ years' occupation). (6) Interim rent (ss.24A-24D): either party can apply; typically market rent. (7) Contracting out: exclude LTA 1954 protection by warning notice + statutory declaration before lease is granted.
Commercial Property
Rent Review Dispute UK — Arbitration, Expert Determination, and the Time-of-the-Essence Trap
What happens when landlord and tenant cannot agree on the reviewed rent — RICS arbitration vs expert determination, the Starmark time-of-the-essence trap, and how comparables evidence is used.
Commercial Insolvency
Insolvency Disclaimer of Lease UK — Liquidator Powers, Guarantor Liability, and Vesting Orders
Understand how IA 1986 s.178 disclaimer works, why guarantors are not released (Warnford v Duckworth), how subtenants apply for vesting orders under s.181, and how landlords rank as unsecured creditors after disclaimer.
Commercial Property Law
Dilapidations Commercial Lease UK — Terminal Dilapidations, the s.18 Cap, Scott Schedule, and Break Clauses
Covers terminal vs interim dilapidations; the Jervis v Harris clause (cost recovery as a debt during the term); Scott Schedule process and RICS Protocol; LTA 1927 s.18(1) diminution in value cap and supersession (Ultraworth [2000]); and the critical interaction between break clauses and dilapidations compliance conditions.