Renters' Rights Act 2025, Phase 1 commencement
Transition readiness pack

Commercial Property

Commercial Periodic Tenancy UK — What Happens When a Lease Expires Without Renewal

When a commercial lease expires and the tenant remains in occupation — whether through oversight, delay in agreeing a new lease, or a deliberate decision to hold over — a periodic tenancy arises by operation of law. The period of the tenancy mirrors the rent payment period (usually quarterly or monthly). If the original lease was protected by the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (LTA 1954) and was not contracted out, the periodic tenancy inherits that protection and the landlord must serve a formal s.25 notice to terminate it. If the original lease was contracted out of LTA 1954, a simple common law notice to quit terminates the periodic tenancy. Understanding which regime applies — and what the landlord or tenant must do to end the holding-over period — is essential to avoid inadvertently creating a protected tenancy or being locked into an unwanted occupation.

Commercial holdover situations arise constantly in practice — a lease expires before a renewal is agreed; the parties are in negotiations and allow the old lease to run on; a tenant informally agrees to stay on for a few extra months. In each case, a periodic tenancy arises and the legal position depends entirely on the LTA 1954 status of the original lease. Landlords who want the property back at lease expiry must act quickly and correctly — serving a valid s.25 notice or common law notice to quit as appropriate — or risk the holding-over period transforming into a situation where the tenant has acquired new statutory rights. Tenants who want renewal certainty should serve a s.26 request for a new tenancy before the current tenancy expires to trigger the LTA 1954 renewal process.

How a Periodic Tenancy Arises on Expiry of a Commercial Lease

When a fixed-term commercial lease expires and the tenant remains in occupation with the landlord's knowledge and acquiescence, a periodic tenancy arises by operation of law on the same terms as the expired lease (except the term). The key principles: (a) The period of the tenancy: the period of the implied periodic tenancy is determined by the intervals at which rent is paid — if rent was paid quarterly, a quarterly periodic tenancy arises; if monthly, a monthly periodic tenancy; (b) The terms: the periodic tenancy is on the same terms as the expired lease so far as they are applicable to a periodic tenancy — this includes the rent (now payable periodically as before), repair obligations, user clause, alienation restrictions, and other terms consistent with a periodic rather than fixed-term tenancy; break clauses and rent review provisions in the original lease may not be applicable to the periodic tenancy as they presuppose a fixed term; (c) LTA 1954 status: if the original lease was within LTA 1954 protection (and was not contracted out), the periodic tenancy is also protected; if the original lease was contracted out of LTA 1954, the periodic tenancy is not protected and can be ended by a common law notice to quit; (d) No formal documentation required: the periodic tenancy arises automatically by operation of law — no new lease document or deed is required; no SDLT is payable on a periodic tenancy arising by implication (as opposed to an express periodic tenancy); (e) Consent to holding over: the landlord's acceptance of rent from the holding-over tenant is the most common form of acquiescence that gives rise to the periodic tenancy; a landlord who wishes to prevent a periodic tenancy from arising should make clear — ideally in writing — that the acceptance of rent is on a licence or on a 'without prejudice to the requirement to vacate' basis.

  • Automatic periodic tenancy: arises by operation of law when the tenant holds over after lease expiry with the landlord's knowledge and acquiescence — no new document is required and no SDLT is payable on the implied periodic tenancy
  • Period matches rent payment: quarterly rent payment creates a quarterly periodic tenancy; monthly rent creates a monthly periodic tenancy; the period determines the notice required to terminate
  • Same terms: the periodic tenancy is on the same terms as the expired lease (except the duration) — rent, repair, user, and alienation obligations continue
  • LTA 1954 status mirrors original lease: a protected lease creates a protected periodic tenancy; a contracted-out lease creates an unprotected periodic tenancy
  • Accepting rent risks periodic tenancy: a landlord who accepts rent from a holding-over tenant without reservation may be taken to have acquiesced in the periodic tenancy; if the landlord wants possession, refuse rent or accept only on a clear 'without prejudice to possession' basis

LTA 1954 Protected Periodic Tenancies — How to Terminate

Where the original commercial lease was protected by LTA 1954 (not contracted out), the periodic tenancy that arises on holding over is also protected by LTA 1954. To terminate a protected periodic tenancy, the landlord must: (a) Serve a valid s.25 notice: the landlord must serve a LTA 1954 s.25 notice terminating the tenancy; the notice must: be in the prescribed form (Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part 2 (Notices) Regulations 2004, SI 2004/1005); specify a termination date that is not less than 6 months and not more than 12 months from the date of service; the termination date must be at least on the expiry of the period of the periodic tenancy; the notice must state whether the landlord is opposed to a new tenancy being granted (if opposed, state the ground(s) under s.30(1) LTA 1954); (b) Tenant's response to a s.25 notice: the tenant must apply to the county court for a new tenancy within the period specified by s.29A LTA 1954 (no later than the date specified in the s.25 notice); if the tenant does not apply, the tenancy ends on the termination date in the s.25 notice; if the tenant does apply, the LTA 1954 renewal process continues before the court; (c) The landlord's grounds of opposition: under s.30(1) LTA 1954, a landlord can oppose a new tenancy on limited grounds — these include grounds relating to the tenant's breach (grounds (a), (b), (c)); the landlord's intention to demolish or reconstruct (ground (f)); the landlord's intention to occupy for its own business or as a residence (ground (g)); and others; without a valid ground of opposition, the landlord must grant a new tenancy (subject to agreeing or determining the terms); (d) No self-help termination: a landlord with a protected periodic tenancy cannot simply give a common law notice to quit to end the tenancy — the s.25 procedure is the only route; a common law notice to quit served on a protected periodic tenancy is ineffective; (e) Interim rent: while the LTA 1954 renewal process continues, the tenant pays interim rent (determined by the court under s.24A LTA 1954 if not agreed — based on open market rent for the new tenancy).

  • LTA 1954 s.25 notice required: the only way to terminate a protected periodic tenancy is by a valid s.25 notice; a common law notice to quit is ineffective; the notice must be in prescribed form and give 6-12 months' notice of termination
  • Tenant's application deadline: the tenant must apply to court for a new tenancy no later than the termination date in the s.25 notice; if no application is made, the tenancy ends on the termination date
  • Grounds of opposition (LTA 1954 s.30(1)): limited statutory grounds only; the most common for landlords seeking possession are ground (f) — demolition or reconstruction; and ground (g) — own occupation; these require genuine intention proven at the time of the s.25 notice and at the date of any court hearing
  • Interim rent (LTA 1954 s.24A): during the renewal process (between the s.25 notice termination date and the actual termination/new lease grant), the landlord can apply for interim rent based on open market rental value; interim rent may be higher or lower than the current periodic tenancy rent
  • Time-critical: serve the s.25 notice as soon as the landlord has decided to oppose renewal or to recover possession; delaying the notice delays the earliest date for termination

Unprotected Periodic Tenancies (Contracted-Out) — Common Law Notice to Quit

Where the original commercial lease was contracted out of LTA 1954 (by a valid court order under the pre-June 2004 procedure or by the s.38A warning notice procedure after June 2004), the periodic tenancy that arises on holding over is NOT protected by LTA 1954. To terminate an unprotected commercial periodic tenancy, the landlord must serve a common law notice to quit: (a) The notice period: the notice to quit must match the period of the tenancy — a quarterly periodic tenancy requires at least one quarter's notice; a monthly periodic tenancy requires at least one month's notice; the notice must expire on the last day of a period of the tenancy (the same day of the quarter or month on which rent falls due); (b) No special form required: unlike a s.25 notice, there is no prescribed form for a common law notice to quit for a commercial tenancy; the notice must: be in writing; identify the property; state the date on which the notice is to take effect (the last day of the relevant period); be signed by or on behalf of the landlord; (c) Service: the notice should be served in accordance with s.196 LPA 1925 (registered post to the demised premises or the tenant's last known address) or as specified in the lease; (d) No grounds required: unlike the LTA 1954 s.25 regime, a landlord terminating an unprotected periodic tenancy by common law notice to quit does not need to state any reason or ground — the notice to quit alone is sufficient to end the tenancy; (e) Tenant's options: the tenant has no LTA 1954 renewal rights — they must vacate on the termination date or face proceedings for possession; (f) Creating a new protected tenancy inadvertently: where the original lease was contracted out but the landlord allows a long holdover period and accepts rent for years without taking steps to end the periodic tenancy, the court may consider whether the parties have, by their conduct, created a new tenancy distinct from the implied periodic tenancy at expiry — if so, that new tenancy might not have the benefit of the contracted-out status of the original.

  • Common law notice to quit: the correct method to end an unprotected (contracted-out) commercial periodic tenancy; no prescribed form; must match the period of the tenancy (one quarter for a quarterly tenancy; one month for a monthly tenancy)
  • Notice must expire at end of period: a quarterly notice to quit must expire on the last day of a quarter (the rent day); a notice expiring on any other day is technically ineffective and risks being invalid
  • No grounds required: unlike LTA 1954 s.25, the landlord does not need to state any reason for ending an unprotected periodic tenancy — the notice to quit is sufficient
  • Service under s.196 LPA 1925: serve by registered post to the demised premises or the tenant's last known address, or in accordance with the service provisions of the expired lease
  • Long holdover risk: allowing an unprotected periodic tenancy to continue for a very long period (years, not months) with significant investment by the tenant may give rise to arguments that the parties have created a new, distinct tenancy — take legal advice if the holdover period becomes extended

Practical Management of the Holdover Period

Best practice for landlords managing a holdover situation: (a) Identify the LTA 1954 status of the original lease immediately on expiry — check the original lease (and any supplemental documents) to determine whether it was contracted out and whether the contracted-out procedure was validly carried out; where the contracted-out procedure is unclear, take legal advice; (b) Decide on strategy promptly: if the landlord wants the property back, serve the appropriate notice (s.25 or notice to quit) as soon as possible — each month of delay is another month added to the minimum notice period; if the landlord is happy to let the tenant continue while a new lease is negotiated, put in writing that the occupancy is on a holding-over basis 'without prejudice to the requirement to vacate or negotiate' to avoid ambiguity; (c) Rent during holdover: the rent payable during the holdover is the same as the rent under the expired lease (unless agreed otherwise); the landlord cannot unilaterally increase the rent during the holding-over period; any agreed rent increase during the holdover should be documented; (d) New lease negotiations: holdover provides a practical period in which to negotiate and agree a new lease without interrupting the tenant's occupation; the new lease should be agreed and executed as promptly as possible to minimise the period of legal uncertainty; (e) The tenant's s.26 request: a tenant who wants to ensure renewal rights should serve a LTA 1954 s.26 request for a new tenancy while the existing (or periodic) tenancy is still current — this triggers the statutory renewal process and protects the tenant's right to a new lease even where the landlord does not serve a s.25 notice.

  • Check LTA 1954 status first: identify whether the original lease was protected or contracted out before deciding on the termination route; an error in the route (e.g. serving a common law notice to quit on a protected tenancy) is ineffective and wastes time
  • Act promptly: every month of delay before serving a termination notice is another month added to the minimum notice required; serve notice as soon as the decision to recover possession is made
  • Document holdover clearly: if rent is accepted during holdover while negotiations continue, put in writing that the acceptance is 'without prejudice to the landlord's right to possession and without creating any new tenancy rights'
  • Tenant's s.26 request: a protected tenant who wants renewal certainty should serve a s.26 request for a new tenancy (specifying the proposed commencement date and rent); this triggers the statutory renewal process and gives the tenant a statutory right to a new lease
  • New lease priority: agree and execute the new lease as quickly as possible — an extended holding-over period is legally uncertain for both parties and creates commercial risk

Frequently asked questions

What happens when a commercial lease expires and the tenant stays on?+

A periodic tenancy arises automatically by operation of law on the same terms as the expired lease (except the duration). The period matches the rent payment interval — usually quarterly or monthly. If the original lease was protected by LTA 1954, the periodic tenancy is also protected and can only be ended by a valid s.25 notice. If the original lease was contracted out, a common law notice to quit of equivalent length to the rent period terminates the tenancy.

How do I end a protected commercial periodic tenancy?+

By serving a valid LTA 1954 s.25 notice in the prescribed form, giving not less than 6 months and not more than 12 months' notice, specifying a termination date at least on the expiry of the current period, and stating whether the landlord is opposed to a new tenancy. A common law notice to quit does not work for a protected periodic tenancy. If the landlord opposes renewal, one of the statutory s.30(1) grounds must be stated.

How long a notice is required for a contracted-out commercial periodic tenancy?+

One period's notice — if rent is paid quarterly, at least one quarter's notice to quit is required, expiring on the last day of a quarter. If rent is paid monthly, at least one month's notice is required, expiring on the last day of a month. No grounds or reasons need to be given. The notice must be in writing and served in accordance with s.196 LPA 1925.

Does accepting rent from a holding-over tenant create a new tenancy?+

Yes, accepting rent generally creates an implied periodic tenancy. If the landlord wants possession at lease expiry and does not wish to create a periodic tenancy, they should either refuse rent or accept it in writing 'without prejudice to the landlord's right to possession and without creating any new tenancy rights.' Taking legal advice before rent is accepted from a holding-over tenant is essential.

What is interim rent during commercial lease renewal?+

Interim rent is the rent payable during the LTA 1954 renewal process — from the termination date stated in the s.25 notice until the new tenancy is granted or the existing tenancy ends. Either party can apply to the court under LTA 1954 s.24A for interim rent to be determined on an open market basis. Interim rent may be higher than the holding-over rent (if the market has moved upwards since the original lease was granted).