Obtaining Consent to Underlet — LTA 1988
Where the head lease contains a qualified alienation covenant, the LTA 1988 requires the landlord to give written consent or written refusal (with reasons) within a reasonable time; the burden of proving reasonableness of refusal lies on the landlord; the landlord cannot charge beyond their own legal/surveying costs; damages are available for unreasonable refusal (Bocardo SA v S&M Hotels Ltd [1980]).
Structure — Term, Covenants, and the Fundamental Rule
The underlease cannot exceed the head lease in term or scope. The minus-one-day convention ensures the underlease expires before the head lease. The underlessee should be bound by covenants mirroring the head lease covenants. The head lessee remains primarily liable to the head landlord for all head lease covenants regardless of the underlessee's conduct.
LTA 1954 — Security of Tenure for Commercial Undertenants
A commercial underlessee has LTA 1954 security of tenure against the intermediate landlord. Under s.65 LTA 1954, if the head lease is not renewed or is forfeited, the underlessee can apply directly against the head landlord for a new tenancy — a significant trap for head landlords unaware of the sub-tenancy. Commercial underleases should be contracted out of LTA 1954 (s.38A procedure) to avoid this risk.
Intermediate Landlord Obligations and Forfeiture
The head lessee must remedy breaches vis-à-vis the head landlord even if caused by the underlessee. Forfeiture of the head lease ends the underlease — but the underlessee can apply for relief under LPA 1925 s.146(4). The head lessee must notify the underlessee of any s.146 notice received from the head landlord. The head lessee can forfeit the underlease for the underlessee's breach — the underlessee can apply for relief from forfeiture.